I was talking with someone the other day who declared that they felt caged by their rage and resentment. They expressed a desire to be able to forgive.
Forgiveness is a difficult subject for any of us. We are challenged to forgive institutions, individuals, ourselves, maybe even God. Forgiveness can be confused with forgetting. Most of us feel like forgiving is not our strongest suit. The reason maybe that forgiveness has often been characterized as something that we do for other people. This traditional characterization may be where we are hung up.
Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki (a bird lover by the way) has a more compelling and even persuasive understanding of forgiveness. This is fully explained in her book The Fall to Violence: Original Sin in Relational Theology. In the work she details three dimensions of forgiveness and two misconceptions:
- Three dimensions of forgiveness
- the action of willing well-being
- the relationship between victim and violator
- and the courage of knowledge and remembrance
- Two misconceptions of forgiveness
- that forgiveness entails feelings of love
- that forgiveness entails an acceptance of the other person
Suchocki asserts that violence in its lesser and greater forms will demand that the person of faith engage forgiveness. The lesser forms of violence might be cutting remarks, gossip, or lack of follow through. The greater forms of violence include loss of live or vitality. Whatever the case, violence, Suchocki says, “…does not end with the completion of its occurrence; it insinuates itself into the ongoing experience of the victim. Violation amounts to the robbery of future time by forcing what should be new experiences to conform to the contours of the old. A person is robbed at gunpoint; the robbery happens in an instant. But does it? Does not the person live and relive the experience of the robbery, repeating the fear and anger in every unguarded moment? ” (147)
Initially the violator is responsible for the violence but who keeps the violence perpetuated? That is within the mind of the victim. This does not blame the victim but it does describe the process and trajectory of violence at whatever level. As the victim internalizes the violence, the violator and the victim become one in the same.
Forgiveness invites the victim to come a strength of mind and a freedom to take flight into life. Forgetting is not an option for those who have experienced violence. It is, indeed, remembering in a specific way that is an option. Allowing our experiences of violence to give us a contextualized knowledge is the first step to strength of mind. For example, someone gossips about us and we find out. We are hurt. We feel the violent effect and our mind begins to cycle around the infraction against us. In order to stop the cycling we might say something like this….”Ahh. I have learned something important about my friend. I will know better how to interact with this person in the future.” A discovery allows us to have specific knowledge. This prevents an anxious generalization which might sound like, “You can’t trust anyone anymore!”
The real reason to forgive is so that our mind, heart and self are genuinely open to the new experiences of life which are coming to us all the time. If our mind is distracted and cycling on previous experiences of violence, we are already missing new life and opportunity. The real reason to FORGIVE is so that we can really LIVE.
Marjorie also ties forgiveness into sin and transformation in her book’s conclusion…a most interesting read! A personal note about Suchocki is that I have heard that she allows the birds she cares for to fly free within her home. A practice that might be symbolic of her argument that we should not cage our life experiences for that is where the greatest violence can happen.
Read Full Post »